This week, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) became the battleground for a heated dialogue on age verification, featuring a stark contrast between regulators and Big Tech heavyweights. FTC Commissioner Mark Meador opened the panel by challenging the term "digital natives," arguing it obscures the engineered realities young people face online.
Meador didn’t mince words, critiquing the tech giants in the room, like Meta and Google, for what he called "socio-emotional experiments" on youth. He contended that these titans have been shaping online environments without enough accountability.
Google’s child safety manager, Emily Cashman Kirstein, spoke on the company’s AI-driven age verification model. Deployed in the U.S., it uses user behavior data to determine age without collecting new information. "We've heard about the promise of using machine learning and AI for this purpose, and that’s exactly what we’re doing at Google," Kirstein explained.
“This is very much an ongoing conversation for us.”
Despite privacy concerns, Google offers alternatives like document verification, presenting a dual approach to safeguarding younger users.
Antigone Davis, Meta’s VP and Global Head of Safety, highlighted their age-specific Teen Accounts and tiered content systems, designed to protect users aged 13-17. Meta’s partnership with k-ID’s OpenAge initiative shows promise but comes with concerns about parental obligations.
Davis emphasized Meta’s push for legislative solutions that place responsibility at the app store level, making age checks easier for parents and teens.
Apple, represented by Nick Rossi, highlighted its robust parental control tools and privacy-focused age verification system, operating directly through the app store. This system aims to provide a secure and streamlined way to manage age-appropriate content.
Robin Tombs, CEO of Yoti, shared insights from over a decade of experience in age checks, emphasizing their role in sectors beyond social media, such as gaming and e-commerce. "We've done over 1 billion facial age estimations," Tombs stated, showcasing Yoti’s deep integration into the age verification landscape.
Graham Dufault of the App Association voiced concerns about app store-level age checks affecting non-threatening apps. He cited Swine Tech’s example to illustrate unnecessary burdens on certain apps.
Commissioner Meador concluded with optimism about evolving verification technologies, stressing they don’t have to be intrusive. He praised third-party solutions that offer efficient and secure age checks without compromising personal data.
"This is elegant. It is efficient. It is secure. And it is the future," Meador affirmed, as the age verification dialogue continues to evolve.