In a striking parliamentary decision, the UK House of Lords has thrown its weight behind a proposed social media ban for those under the age of 16. The motion, passed by a significant majority of 261 to 150 votes, now heads to the House of Commons for further consideration. This bold move aligns with an Australian-style push to protect children from the potential harms lurking online.
Supporters of the ban assert that parents face an uphill battle against the digital dangers threatening their kids. Technology Secretary Liz Kendall has introduced a three-month consultation to weigh the pros and cons of the ban, explore potential overnight curfews, and address the issue of "doom-scrolling." This consultation is set to conclude by summer.
"The Government’s consultation is, in my view, unnecessary, misconceived and clearly a last-minute attempt to kick this can down the road," remarked Lord Nash, criticizing the delay.
Lord Nash, the former schools minister leading the charge, was vocal in his criticism of the government's approach, seeing it as a tactic to postpone action. He passionately argued for immediate steps to curb the extensive time teens spend on social media, warning of its negative impact on health, cognition, education, and more. "We must act now," he urged colleagues.
Baroness Cass joined in, emphasizing that government duties include proactive measures rather than endless consultations. Meanwhile, filmmaker and children's rights advocate Baroness Kidron slammed the delay as a win for tech lobbyists, accusing the government of only acting under pressure.
Backing the amendment were high-profile figures like Hollywood star Hugh Grant, singer Peter Andre, and actress Sophie Winkleman, who all signed a letter urging swift action. The emotional letter, supported by groups like Parentkind and Mumsnet, painted a vivid picture of the risks children face online. It highlighted the tragic case of Brianna Ghey, whose mother attributed her social media addiction to constant fear and danger.
Liberal Democrat Lord Clement-Jones, however, cautioned against creating a sterile digital environment that may not equip children for sudden exposure to harmful content on their 16th birthday.
The proposed changes will now be scrutinized by MPs in a process known as "ping-pong," where the bill bounces between the Commons and Lords until consensus is achieved. Among the amendments is a ban on VPN services for children, addressing concerns over bypassing age verification for adult content.
A government spokesperson assured that the focus remains on fostering a healthier relationship between children and their digital devices. The ongoing consultation aims to partner with experts and families to finalize evidence-based strategies.