Wyoming Panel Moves To Keep R-Rated Reads From Minors

Wyoming Clamps Down on Library Shelves

In a move that’s causing quite a stir, a Wyoming legislative panel gave the nod to a bill on Monday that aims to control where certain books are placed in public and school libraries. This proposed law would have significant implications, allowing citizens to take legal action against libraries and school districts if they find sexually explicit content in areas accessible to minors.

The Joint Judiciary Committee voted 11-2 in favor of sponsoring the bill, which has quickly become a hot topic ahead of the 2026 legislative session. Albany County Republican Sen. Gary Crum, though absent for the vote, had previously voiced doubts about the legislation. Despite his absence, the bill received support from a majority of the committee members.

Supporters and Detractors Speak Out

The proposed legislation has united Wyoming Freedom Caucus members and Republicans in a rare show of solidarity. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Jared Olsen made his stance clear, stating, “I frankly believe that many of these books are nothing more than pornographic material.” His comments reflect a widespread concern about minors accessing inappropriate content.

“We’re talking about having adult materials be in the adult section, that adults can go get for their kids still if they want to. It’s just not on the shelf so my son goes in there and stumbles across it,” said Rep. Tom Kelly.

However, the bill has fierce opposition from those who see it as censorship, and fear it undercuts intellectual freedom and targets LGBTQ authors. Cristine Braddy, president of the Wyoming Library Association, criticized the bill for attempting to ban books by restricting access.

Amendments and Reactions

The attempt to advance this legislation follows significant revisions. Lawmakers lowered proposed fines and created avenues for libraries to voluntarily remove contentious materials, potentially avoiding penalties. Yet, critics argue the bill still invites disputes over what constitutes ‘sexually explicit’ content.

Rep. Ken Chestek criticized the bill as a form of censorship, potentially leading to the removal of books due to vague standards. He called it a “bounty hunting situation” for activists eager to challenge library collections.

Despite the debate, proponents like Rep. Jayme Lien believe they have addressed many concerns with their amendments. As the 2026 session approaches, the bill is expected to spark extensive debate, particularly given the tight legislative schedule focused primarily on budgeting.